Legal Opinion

Petrie v. State Commission on Judicial Conduct

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The determination of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct should be accepted.

Petitioner argues that the procedures followed by the commission were beyond its powers and did not afford petitioner due process. The commission is empowered with broad authority to investigate charges of improprieties by members of the judiciary. (Matter of Nicholson v State Comm., *80850 NY2d 597.) The course of the commission’s investigation and proceedings are governed by the detailed provisions of section 44 of the Judiciary Law. Pursuant to this section, thé commission investigated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. State Commission on Judicial ConductNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re CooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Bartlett v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Matter of BackalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In re RaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Matter of EmbserNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Matter of TamsenNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API