Legal Opinion

State v. Howe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1995No. 95-455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question before this court is whether the court of appeals erred in dismissing appellant’s application to reopen for lack of jurisdiction. S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(D)(1) states: “After an appeal is perfected from a court of appeals to the Supreme Court, the court of appeals is divested of jurisdiction, except to take action in aid of the appeal, to rule on an application for reconsideration filed with the court of appeals pursuant to Rule 26 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, or to rule on a motion to certify a conflict under Article IV, Section 3(B)(4) of the Ohio Constitution.”

*37An…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AyalaOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. Broadnax, Unpublished Decision (12-4-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. HoweOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API