Legal Opinion

Hjerstedt v. Fuller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

Claimant filed a claim for $160 on account of professional services rendered as a professional nurse to the deceased. The claim was supported solely by the testimony of the claimant as to the extent and nature of the services and their value. The court was of the opinion that the claimant was incompetent to testify as to the nature of the services and the amount of services rendered because they constituted a transaction with a deceased person from whom she was claiming; that under *446sec. 325.16, Stats, (formerly sec. 4069), she was not a competent witness.

It has been held in at least four…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baehr v. BuellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Belden v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Sucke v. HutchinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gardner v. Young's EstateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirkpatrick v. MilksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API