Legal Opinion

City of MacOmb v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1932No. 21199. Order reversed and award set asidePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone

Defendant in error, Mary Whittlesey, filed an application for compensation arising out of the death of her husband, J. Edward Whittlesey, a policeman of plaintiff in error city. The arbitrator, on hearing, found that deceased and plaintiff in error were on November 29, 1930, the day of Whittlesey’s death, operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act; that deceased sustained accidental injury resulting in his death which arose out of and in the course of his employment and entered an award under paragraph (a) of section 7 of the Workmen’s Compensation act. The Industrial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moon v. MayorIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. People ex rel. Sartison v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Waterman v. Chicago & Iowa RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. City of Chicago v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of West Frankfort v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People Ex Rel. Hess v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API