In re the Estate of Little
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 —An executor must give notice of probate to the deceased’s heirs, as required by statute. When heirs show notice was not provided to them, a completed estate will be reopened unless the executor demonstrates that the names and addresses of the heirs were not reasonably ascertainable through the exercise of due diligence.
Becker, J.
FACTS
¶2 Martin Little died on August 6, 1992 at age 89, two months after executing his last will and testament. Little had nieces and nephews, but no children of his own. He left behind a considerable estate. His will devised all of his *917property to John Vannoy,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Jones v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Hesthagen v. HarbyWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- In re the Estate of TothWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Pitzer v. Union Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re The Estate Of Constance E. Little Roxanne Trees, Res. v. Renae Roberson, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Golden v. World Gospel MissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In Re Estate of HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- In Re Estate of PalmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In re the Estate of HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007