Legal Opinion

People v. Hartwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1918No. Crim. No. 608PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. T. L. Lewis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Upon an information charging him therewith, defendant was convicted of the offense defined in section 288 of the Penal Code.

On his appeal prosecuted from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial, numerous alleged errors are argued in support of a reversal, only one of which, however, we deem it necessary to consider.

In the course of the trial the court, over defendant’s objection, admitted in evidence the testimony of Officer Cooley as to what transpired on the occasion of a visit made by defendant to his home, as follows: “We went into the house . . . and his wife and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. McCreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. People v. PhilbonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. LoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Thrasher v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Territory v. CorumHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  5. People v. MarineauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API