Legal Opinion

Rush v. Rush

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from, Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, Judge

This was a proceeding by the respondents to set aside the will of their ancestor, Wm. Rush, on the ground of insanity. On a trial, there was a verdict for the respondents. It appears on the face of the proceedings, that two of the defendants were minors and appeared by attorney. For this cause, on motion, the court arrested the judgment as to the infants, and entered *442a final judgment against the adult defendants. From this judgment they appealed.

This 'cause does not raise the question, whether any other party than the infant himself can take advantage of his infancy. The judgment was.properly…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neenan v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Bailey v. McGinnissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Smith's Administrator v. RollinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  5. McCarthy v. Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API