Legal Opinion
LB & B Associates Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 8, 2005No. 05-1066LPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
The present post-award bid protest was filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2000). At issue is a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) for a small business set-aside task order (“task order”) to provide maintenance of flight' simulation equipment to the United States Air Force (“Air Force”). The RFP was issued pursuant to a multi-award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (“ID/IQ”) contract previously awarded by the Air Force in 2001. The underlying ID/IQ contract, known as Training Systems Acquisition II (“TSA II contract”), authorized the Air Force to issue task orders for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Baird Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Precise Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Lukos Vatc Jv LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Palladian Partners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- 22nd Century Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Defense Integrated Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.