Legal Opinion
State v. Arnold
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 1984No. 13007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TITUS, Judge.
Defendant was charged with violating § 195.020 1 by selling marijuana [spelled “marihuana” in § 195.010(22)], a Schedule I controlled substance, to Springfield Police Officer Clark on June 26, 1981. With assent of the court, defendant waived a trial by jury. Rule 27.01(b). Following trial wherein defendant offered no evidence, the court declared defendant guilty as charged. After defendant’s post-trial motion was overruled, the court entered its judgment and sentenced defendant to imprisonment for a term of 10 years. § 195.200.1(4). Defendant appealed.
On June 26, 1981, Officer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. HohenseeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. RitterbachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. SammonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Marvin Roth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BolenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. R_ D_ GMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. HicksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. ShawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.