Legal Opinion

Estate of Claghorn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1897No. Appeal, No. 368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 368, Jan. T., 1896, by the Commercial National Bank, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., 'Oct. T., 1894, No. 261, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. Tbe facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to adjudication.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

James L. Claghorn, of Philadelphia, died on August 25,1884, leaving to survive him a widow, Julia S. Claghorn, and one son, J. Raymond Claghorn, then past his majority. He left a will, of which he appointed his widow and son executors. At his death, he was possessed of a considerable estate, probably, at that time, if it had been turned into cash, more than sufficient to pay his debts. But settlement of the estate was delayed by his representatives; no account was filed until one was compelled by the orphans’ court, April 5, 1895. This account was very confused and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fritz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  2. Estate of LightPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Lebanon County · 1890
  3. Appeal of McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Charles B. Wolf, Charles S. Wold, Frances G. Wolf, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Standard Plate Glass Co. v. Butler Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Kalin v. WehrleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Freed's Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API