Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Tilly

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Texas Circuit Court. — Hon. V. M. Hines, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombatjer, P. J.

The action is unlawful detainer. The plaintiff recovered judgment for possession and damages. The errors assigned by the defendant are that the plaintiff’s statement is jurisdictionally defective, and that under the uncontroverted facts the judgment' should have been for the defendant.

The statement, omitting the caption, is as follows:

“William L. Bradford complains to John McDonald, a justice of the peace within and for the county of Pulaski, that on the fifth day of March, 1894, he had the legal right to the possession of the north half of the southwest quarter, and the southeast quarter of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Butts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Stevenson v. HancockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Witte v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Young v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  5. Sexton v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ray v. BlackmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Roosevelt Hotel Corp. v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Cooper v. RatleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Tucker v. McClenneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Shantz v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API