Legal Opinion

Besley v. Ridgely

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 1915No. Gen. No. 21,155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henby C. Beitleb, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

We desire to call the attention of counsel to their violation of section 99, ch. 110 (J. & A. ¶ 8636), entitled “Practice,” in not entitling their case on review as it is entitled in the trial court, as provided by said section 99. The abstracts and briefs are all erroneously entitled. The statute was passed to preserve uniformity of title in every court and to prevent confusion arising from changes in titles, and should be obeyed accordingly.

This is an action for one month’s rent of an apartment in which the parties hereto are respectively landlord and tenant. The landlord prevailed in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clinton Wire Cloth Co. v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Schilling v. KleinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hines v. Ward Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  2. Butz v. ButzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Evans v. SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API