Legal Opinion

Finnell v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 1, 1930No. 8 Div. 133PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The plaintiff owns, as the complaint shows, one hundred and eighty-five acres of farm land, and appellants, as highway commissioners of the state, are alleged to have built a state highway near it, and in doing so, a high embankment was constructed across a stream which drained a lake, and thereby diverted the waters from its natural flow, and caused them to flow upon and over plaintiff’s land, submerging thirty acres, permanently injuring and destroying its value, and that the whole of the tract was depreciated in value, and that there has been no compensation paid him.

Appellants claim…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. State Docks Commission v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Crigler v. SalacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Unzicker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API