Morgan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.
The facts seem ample to support the verdict, and we perceive no advantage in setting them out at length or in detail.
There are a number of bills of exception, each of which has been carefully examined. Several of these bills complain of testimony, the reception of which was objected to because of supposed defects in the affidavit and search warrant. Neither the affidavit nor the search warrant referred to are made parts of or exhibits to any of said bills. This is…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Mier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.