Griffith v. Bird
Supreme Court of Virginia
The case is sufficiently stated by Judge Christian, delivering the opinion of the court. A father, if of ability, is bound to maintain his infant children, even though they have property of their own.
Read the full summary
The case is sufficiently stated by Judge Christian, delivering the opinion of the court. A father, if of ability, is bound to maintain his infant children, even though they have property of their own. Judge Spencer, in Edwards v. Davis, 16 John R. 281, and Robertson, J. 15 Gratt. 513. The duty of educating them by natural and moral law, as binding, is not so clearly defined in our own English jurisprudence; though this, too, is recognized as a positive right by the courts of some of our sister States. Stanton v. Wilson, 3 Day’s R. 37; Parson’s Cont., 3d edi., page 245, and note. In Myers v.…
1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit court of Westmoreland county. The bill was filed by the creditors of E. C Griffith, who departed this life in the year 1861, seized and possessed of considerable estate, real and personal. The object of the bill was to have a settlement of the accounts of his administrator, to ascertain the amount of his indebtedness, and to effect a sale of his real estate for the payment of his debts.
The said Griffith in his lifetime had qualified as guardian of two of his children, to wit, Eleanor and Frederick, and received as such guardian certain real and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Claytor v. AnthonySupreme Court of Virginia · 1860
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Valley Bank v. HancockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Hauser v. KingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882