Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Jensen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 21, 1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

-SIMS, Justice. •

This action was instituted by Edward Jensen against Henry Oakes to recover $5,-400 damages on the ground that Oakes had maliciously prosecuted two forcible de-tainer warrants and one peace warrant against him. On the trial Jensen recovered $1,290 damages and in seeking a reversal ,of that judgment Oakes insists the trial judge erred: (1) In not sustaining his motion for a directed verdict to so much of the action as was based upon the forcible de-tainer warrants; (2) in not properly instructing the jury.

Jensen by - an oral agreement rented an apartment by the month from Oakes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Engleman v. Caldwell and JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Helge v. BabeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Baber v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. Oliver v. MuncyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. BlakemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API