Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Strouse

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2006No. 207 MDA 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Lynn A. Strouse appeals the judgment of sentence (nine to twenty-three months imprisonment) for attempting to lure a child into a motor vehicle1 on grounds that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We affirm.

¶ 2 “The standard of reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence is whether the evidence admitted at trial and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, when viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as the verdict winner, is *369sufficient to support all the elements of the offenses beyond a reasonable doubt.” Commonwealth…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. FigueroaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Com. v. Gilmore, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Com. v. Green, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Com. v. Jackson, R., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Lawrence, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Matthews, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API