Legal Opinion

Soehner v. Aplo Clothing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order modified and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The production of books, papers and records cannot be compelled by notice. It must be done by order (Civ. Prae. Act, § 296), and the order herein was only one passing upon the validity of the notice, and vacating parts thereof. The subjects of the examination set forth in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the notice might seem to relate to matters of defense but, in his first cause of action, as alleged in paragraph 3 of the complaint, plaintiff conditions his right to recover upon his work being “ all right ” and, therefore, has assumed…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KaplanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  2. Sapakas v. ShulskNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Harold J. Smith Leather Corp. v. Slater-Boroff, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API