Legal Opinion
Eikert v. Beebe
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 2016No. Nos. 50,504-WCA, 50,505-WCAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPitman, J.
| iPaul Eikert appeals a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (“WCJ”) in favor of Deborah Beebe. For the following reasons, we reverse.
' FACTS
On December 19, 2002, Ms. Beebe was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of . her employment at Mr. Ei-kert’s store. On July 21,. 2003, she filed a Form 1008, i.e., a disputed claim for compensation. On, November 16, 2004, the WCJ entered a judgment (the “2004 judgment”) in favor of Ms. Beebe and against Mr. Eikert of $7,666.25 in medical bills and $6,000 in penalties and attorney fees. The WCJ ordered that Mr. Eikert “pay all…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lester v. Southern Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Lubom v. LJ Earnest, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Frazier v. Conagra, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Knotts v. Snelling TemporariesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Whittington v. Rimcor, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stemcor USA Inc. v. Cia Siderurgica Do Para CosiparCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Stemcor USA Inc. v. CIA Siderurgica Do Para CosiparCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Stemcor USA Inc. v. Cia Siderurgica Do Para CosiparCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017