Legal Opinion

State v. Britford

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2024No. 23AP-363PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Britford,

2024-Ohio-820.] Judgment reversed. The trial court erred by sustaining an objection which was never made and by rendering judgment without considering all the evidence. Because appellant’s income decreased significantly in the year prior to trial, the court erred by failing to explain why it refused to reserve jurisdiction to modify the spousal support award.IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 23AP-363 v. : (C.P.C. No. 08CR-6158) Quian R. Britford, : (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State ex rel. Gordon v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Compton v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State Ex Rel. Brown v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CherryOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. State v. BritfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API