Legal Opinion

Barnes v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 3, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2015-2120Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) VALERIE BARNES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Civil Action No. 15-2120 (EGS) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction On November 26, 2013, pro se plaintiff Valerie Barnes (“Ms. Barnes”) was crossing the street when she was allegedly struck by a vehicle driven by federal employee Craig Wasster. Ms. Barnes brings suit against Mr. Wasster’s employer, the United States of America (“the defendant” or “the government”), for damages caused by his negligent driving pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  4. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Southwest Marine, Inc. v. GizoniSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API