M. Pachman, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.
This is an action on two policies of insurance against burglary, one known as a mercantile safe policy and the other ás a mercantile open stock policy, the former a $25,000, the latter a $1,000 coverage. The two policies are substantially similar in form. The defendant by one of its policies agreed " To indemnify the Assured for all loss by burglary, of property insured hereunder from within that part of any safe or vault * * *, while such safe or vault is duly closed, and locked by at least one combination or time lock and located in the Assured’s premises as hereinafter defined.” The policy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- S. W. Scott & Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Elco Shoe Manufacturers, Inc. v. SiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Grady v. Concordia Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Graley v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of BassettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- County of Erie v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944