Legal Opinion
United States v. 74.05 Acres of Land
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 9, 2006No. 3:03 CV 1953(PCD)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE THE CLAIM OF THE CANTON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST, INC
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States of America, moves [Doc. No. 23] to dismiss or strike the Verified Claim/Statement of Interest or Right of Defendant, Canton Land Conservation Trust, Inc., for lack of standing. In addition, Plaintiff seeks to dismiss or strike the Trust’s claim pursuant to the relation back doctrine. The Plaintiffs Motion is granted for the following reasons.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff, the United States of America, brought this civil in rem forfeiture action…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re: Scholastic Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. 1. All Funds in Account of Property Futures, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- United States v. Currency $11,331District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- United States v. Real Property Located at 229 Potter RoadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- United States v. Assets Described in "Attachment A" to the Verified Complaint Forfeiture in RemDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.