Legal Opinion
Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*518The motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]). Defendant’s possession of medical records, including a sonogram stating that the infant plaintiffs mother had severely low amniotic fluid and that intrauterine growth restriction to the fetal plaintiff should be ruled out, established actual notice of the essential facts constituting the claim within the statutory 90-day period (see Greene v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 35 AD3d 206, 207 [2006]). Defendant’s claim that the memories of its employees are no longer at their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dubowy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bayo v. Burnside Mews AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Greene v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Kellel B. v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Alvarez v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Alvarez v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Wally G. v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. (Metropolitan Hospital)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Wally G. v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. (Metropolitan Hospital)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014