Legal Opinion

Hattaway v. Planters' Cotton Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 1917No. 1734Published

1Opinion of the CourtWiluson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). It devolved upon appellant to adduce testimony tending to show, not only that appellee was guilty of negligence, but that its negligence was the proximate cause of the injury he suffered. “Proximate cause” has been defined as “the direct cause, without which the injury would not have happened.” Railway Co. v. Averill, 136 S. W. 98; Railway Co. v. Harton, 36 Tex. Civ. App. 475, 81 S, W. 1236; Hilji v. Hettich, 95 Tex. 321, 67 S. W. 90; Jones v. Wlalker County Lumber Co., 162 S. W. 420; Oil Co. v. Edgmon, 155 S. W. 1012; Railway Co. v. Smith, 133 S. W. 482.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hilje v. HettichTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bunn v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Rumbley v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Galveston, H. & S, A. Ry. Co. v. AverillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API