United States v. De Palma
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
After having been found guilty by jury verdict on all counts with which he was charged, 1 defendant Leonard Horwitz (“Horwitz”) moved in timely fashion for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29, Fed.R.Crim.P. or, in the alternative, for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33, and for such other relief as might be found appropriate. With the exception of that part of the application dealing with the asserted denial of due process, Horwitz’s motions are denied because no significant authorities have been suggested by Horwitz other than those previously considered and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Walter Morrison A/K/A "Skip" Morrison Appeal of Nick BosciaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Ralph Kelly Taylor, IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Norman TurkishCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- United States v. Leon A. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.