Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reiner v. North American Newspaper Alliance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1932Published

1Concurrence

Lehman, J. (concurring in result).

We must assume upon this appeal that the allegations of the answer are true; we may not draw from these allegations any inference of fact which does not follow from them as a necessary and irrefutable conclusion. It may be true that the defendant at the time it made the contract knew of the terms and conditions of the plaintiff’s contract of passage on the Graf Zeppelin, and conspired with the plaintiff to avail itself of expected benefits from that contract and to disregard the restrictive conditions without which those benefits could not be obtained. If the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. de Cordova v. SanvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. De Cordova v. . SanvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API