Legal Opinion
Holmes v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1956No. 4288PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LOTTINGER, Judge.
This suit was instituted under the workmen’s compensation act, LSA-R.S. 23:1021 et seq., by Emerson Holmes against the New Amsterdam Casualty Company; which carried the workmen’s compensation insurance for Ronald A. Coco, Inc. Petitioner claims total and permanent disability as a result of the alleged accident and seeks judgment of $30 per week for a period of 400 weeks, plus medical and attorney fees. The Lower Court rendered judgment in favor of petitioner and against the defendant at the rate of $26.55 per week for a period not to exceed more than 400 weeks, subject to a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dolhonde v. Gullett Gin Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Franks v. Department of Highways for LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Sumrall v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Cascio v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- O'Connor v. American Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holmes v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961