Legal Opinion · Dissent

Biella v. State Department of Highways

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1982No. 81CA0245Published

1DissentKelly, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority holding under Section I and Section II, but disagree with the approach taken under Section III.

C.R.C.P. 55(e) provides:

“No judgment by default shall be entered against an officer or agency of the State of Colorado unless the claimant establishes his claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to the court.”

The majority has elected to treat the State’s arguments as falling under that portion of C.R.C.P. 55(e) requiring “evidence satisfactory to the court.” I have more concern for that portion of the rule which requires the claimant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. KerrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Millard v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Sunshine v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  4. F & S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. ChristliebSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. SaBell's, Inc. v. FlensColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API