Legal Opinion

Bearman Fruit Co. v. Parker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1942No. 33,134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his alternative motion to set aside a default judgment because of plaintiff’s laches in entering it, or, if that be denied, that the judgment be set aside and that defendant be permitted to answer.

On August 31, 1937, defendant was indebted to plaintiff in the amount of $555.19 for merchandise purchased. On September 1, plaintiff’s counsel prepared a summons and complaint and on the next day sued out a writ of attachment by virtue of which the sheriff of Ramsey county levied upon two trucks belonging to defendant. On the 14th,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crocker v. BerghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Slatoski v. JendroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Orth v. GedornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Davenport v. SackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Pederson v. Rose Cooperative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Anderson v. SundstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API