Kevyn Terry v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, C.J.
In this direct appeal, Appellant, Kevyn Terry, argues that the trial court erred in denying his unopposed motion for a continuance. Notwithstanding the State’s concession of error, we affirm. Appellant, who pled nolo contendere to the charged offenses, did not reserve the right to appeal the denial of his motion for a continuance, and the order denying his motion was not dispositive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) (providing that a defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere may expressly reserve the right to appeal a prior dispositive order of the lower tribunal, identifying with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- M.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Madison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edward Lamont Hicks v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Kevyn L. Terry v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017