Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Hopkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1967No. 38535Published

1Opinion of the Court

70 Wn.2d 924 (1967)

425 P.2d 920

JAMES H. FITZGERALD et al., Appellants,

v.

ROBERT HOPKINS et al., Respondents.[*]

No. 38535.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 30, 1967.

Miracle, Treadwell & Pruzan, for appellants.

Paul W. Robben and Arthur G. Barnett, for respondents.

WEAVER, J.

At the trial level this case presented a scintillating and intriguing dissertation on the art of sculpturing. It loses much of its glitter on appeal, however, for it presents, basically, a fact question.

Plaintiff, James H. Fitzgerald, 54 years of age, alleges in his complaint and amended complaint that "he has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Malstrom v. KallandWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Lake Air, Inc. v. DuffyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Grein v. LaPomaWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API