Fitzgerald v. Hopkins
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
70 Wn.2d 924 (1967)
425 P.2d 920
JAMES H. FITZGERALD et al., Appellants,
v.
ROBERT HOPKINS et al., Respondents.[*]
No. 38535.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
March 30, 1967.
Miracle, Treadwell & Pruzan, for appellants.
Paul W. Robben and Arthur G. Barnett, for respondents.
WEAVER, J.
At the trial level this case presented a scintillating and intriguing dissertation on the art of sculpturing. It loses much of its glitter on appeal, however, for it presents, basically, a fact question.
Plaintiff, James H. Fitzgerald, 54 years of age, alleges in his complaint and amended complaint that "he has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Malstrom v. KallandWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Lake Air, Inc. v. DuffyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Grein v. LaPomaWashington Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.