Legal Opinion

Co-Ordinating Corp. v.Mengel Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 21, 1934Published

1Per curiam

As there was no issue of fact presented on. the motion it was error to appoint a referee. (Slutzkin v. Gerhard & Hey, Inc., 195 App. Div. 559; Buchholtz v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 59 id. 566.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to the court below for decision on the papers.

Callahan and Frankenthaler, JJ., concur; Shientag, J., dissents in part in memorandum.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slutzkin v. Gerhard & Hey, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921