Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Hudson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2010No. 2010-1054PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Lawrence E. Wilson, pro se. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Thelma Thomas Price, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Lawrence E. Wilson, for a writ of habeas corpus. As the court of appeals properly held, habeas corpus is not available to raise Wilson’s various claims. See Shroyer v. Banks, 123 Ohio St.3d 88, 2009-Ohio-4080, 914 N.E.2d 368, ¶ 1 (validity of charging instrument and ineffective assistance of counsel); Durain v. Sheldon, 122 Ohio St.3d 582, 2009-Ohio-4082, 913…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jaffal v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Tucker v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Tucker v. McAninchOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Durain v. SheldonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Shroyer v. BanksOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kneuss v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bell v. McConahayOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Curtis v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API