Wilson v. Hudson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. Lawrence E. Wilson, pro se. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Thelma Thomas Price, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Lawrence E. Wilson, for a writ of habeas corpus. As the court of appeals properly held, habeas corpus is not available to raise Wilson’s various claims. See Shroyer v. Banks, 123 Ohio St.3d 88, 2009-Ohio-4080, 914 N.E.2d 368, ¶ 1 (validity of charging instrument and ineffective assistance of counsel); Durain v. Sheldon, 122 Ohio St.3d 582, 2009-Ohio-4082, 913…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Jaffal v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Tucker v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Tucker v. McAninchOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Durain v. SheldonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Shroyer v. BanksOhio Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kneuss v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Bell v. McConahayOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- Curtis v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019