Garza v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is felony theft, with three prior convictions alleged to enhance the punishment; the punishment, life.
In view of our disposition of the case, a recitation of the facts of the primary offense will not be necessary. The sufficiency of the evidence to identify appellant as the defendant in the prior convictions confronts us at the outset.
*235The indictments, judgments and sentences in Cause No. 4361 from Wharton County and Cause No. 745 from Kleberg County, and the judgment and sentence in Cause No. 1590 from Starr County were introduced in evidence. In order to prove…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Grimmett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956