Legal Opinion

Kurland v. Chernobil

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1932PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Brien, J.

In September, 1929, plaintiffs were injured in a collision between automobiles operated in this State respectively by defendants Chernobil and Lehmann. Shortly thereafter this action was instituted and, although Lehmann was then a resident of this State, Chernobil was made sole party defendant. After Lehmann had become a resident of California, section 52-a of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 71) was enacted and on March 27, 1931, it became effective. A month later Lehmann was named as defendant in a supplemental summons and complaint and a copy was served upon the Secretary of…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Adams Dairy Company v. National Dairy Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
  3. Krueger v. Rheem Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Levin v. Ruby Trading CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. Guerra De Chapa v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API