Kurland v. Chernobil
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO'Brien, J.
In September, 1929, plaintiffs were injured in a collision between automobiles operated in this State respectively by defendants Chernobil and Lehmann. Shortly thereafter this action was instituted and, although Lehmann was then a resident of this State, Chernobil was made sole party defendant. After Lehmann had become a resident of California, section 52-a of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 71) was enacted and on March 27, 1931, it became effective. A month later Lehmann was named as defendant in a supplemental summons and complaint and a copy was served upon the Secretary of…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Adams Dairy Company v. National Dairy Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
- Krueger v. Rheem Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Levin v. Ruby Trading CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Guerra De Chapa v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.