Barbara Pinkus v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice Fillmore
Barbara Pinkus appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Hartford Casualty Insurance Company. In two issues, Barbara argues the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Hartford, a workers’ compensation insurance carrier, was erroneous because her, husband, Ron Pinkus, was in the course and scope of his employment at the time he was injured in a motor vehicle accident, and if Barbara is the prevailing party on appeal, she is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees.2 We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
*618Procedural Background
Barbara filed a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Timpte Industries, Inc. v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Patient Advocates of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Paul H. Smith v. Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin DenneyTexas Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.