Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Southampton Township Board of Auditors

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County

Decided July 14, 1992No. 1500 Civil 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLEY, J.,

Since 1988, appellant Erma Hinkle has been a full-time working supervisor for Southampton Township, a municipality under the Second Class Township Code, 53 P.S. §65101 et seq. Appellee, Southampton Township, Cumberland County, Board of Auditors, filed a report for the year ending December 31, 1991, pursuant to 53 P.S. §65547. The board surcharged appellant $1,315.04. Its report states:

“During the audit of township invoices paid, it was found that the township is paying for health coverage for persons not eligible according to the guidelines for coverage. In researching eligibility…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. ZeranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Appeal of Auditors v. KomaneckyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Draper AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API