Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1901PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Fite. Whitfield superior court. ■October 19, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

This case seems to have been tried under a misapprehension of the rules of law which govern the issues raised by the pleadings and evidence. Mrs. Hunt, administratrix, instituted her action against Mrs. Cannon, to recover what she alleged was due to *502her intestate as a balance on the contract price for furnishing material and erecting a brick store and office building in the city of Dalton. The work was undertaken under a contract, the material stipulations of which are as follows: The intestate agreed to furnish all the materials and labor of every kind, and build complete, on the lot of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glacius v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. McArthur v. SearsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Fish v. Chapman & RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Doster v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  5. Woodruff v. . Roch. Pitts. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Norair Engineering Corp. v. Saint Joseph's Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Ryan v. Curlew Irrigation & Reservoir Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Standard Supply Co. v. Carter HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API