Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'HARA v. Ahlgren, Blumenfeld & Kempster

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 24, 1987No. 84-0105Published

1DissentJustice Pincham

I dissent. According to the record, plaintiff, Maria O’Hara, the widow of attorney Barratt O’Hara II, entered into an agreement in 1977 to sell the goodwill and physical property of decedent’s law office and practice to defendants’ law firm and its principals for a percentage of income which was derived from decedent’s practice. The agreement also required defendants to provide periodic accountings to plaintiff. The agreement was drafted by the defendants, who were lawyers. The agreement was signed by plaintiff, a lay person, without the advice or benefit of a lawyer.

Pursuant to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corti v. FleisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Schnackenberg v. TowleIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Dr. Charles W. Smith III, Ltd. v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Merchandise National Bank v. KolberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. In Re Estate of BrittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API