Legal Opinion

AmSouth Bank, N.A. v. British West Florida, L.L.C.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 21, 2007No. 2060368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Judge.

Three of the defendants in this action, AmSouth Bank, N.A. (“AmSouth”), Sea Shell, Inc. (“Sea Shell”), and Island House, Inc. (“Island House”), appeal a judgment (1) declaring that the restrictive covenants limiting the use of nine contiguous beachfront lots (“the nine lots”) in Orange Beach to single-family dwellings are unenforceable and (2) denying AmSouth, Sea Shell, and Island House’s counterclaim seeking compensation for the loss of those restrictive covenants. We affirm.

Because the action was tried before the trial judge without a jury and the trial judge heard evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waltman v. RowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. TRANSAMERICA COM. FIN. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Dennis v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Fadalla v. FadallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Lange v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. BoydCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Bekken v. Greystone Residential Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  3. Lancaster v. EvansCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  4. Trevor Cole v. Arthur M. Davis, Ronald F. Ham, Patricia G. Hooper, Thomas R. Miller, Sara A. Minor, June Montgomery, Jill Murray, and Debbie RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API