Legal Opinion

Garabaldi v. Wright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from Pulaski Circuit Court. J. W. Martin, Judge. Garabaldi and Wright were partners in a stock farm, and becoming dissatisfied undertook on the 24th day of December, 1886, to settle the affairs of the partnership. Wright contends that such settlement was consummated. This is denied by Garabaldi, who, on the 3d day of P'ebruary, 1887, filed his bill in chancery against Wright for a dissolution of the partnership and a settlement between the parties.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from Pulaski Circuit Court. J. W. Martin, Judge. Garabaldi and Wright were partners in a stock farm, and becoming dissatisfied undertook on the 24th day of December, 1886, to settle the affairs of the partnership. Wright contends that such settlement was consummated. This is denied by Garabaldi, who, on the 3d day of P'ebruary, 1887, filed his bill in chancery against Wright for a dissolution of the partnership and a settlement between the parties. A receiver was appointed who sold the personal property of the .partnership under an order of the court. On the 21st day of September,…

1Opinion of the CourtHemingway, J.

Conflict of jurisdiction. Although property, of which conversion is alleged, is in the custody of a Chancery Court, an action for its conversion may be brought in a law court, since it does not affect the possession of the property, or interfere with its custody.

Actions between same parties. If the chattels belonged to the appellee, and were converted by the appellant, this was a wrong for which a right of action arose to the appellee individually; and although there was a pending suit in chancery between the parties for an account and settlement of partnership affairs, the appellee could…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Askew v. Murdock Acceptance CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Braswell v. GehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Hubinger v. Central Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BroomfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  5. Wllson v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API