Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1983No. 18617Published

1Opinion of the Court

663 P.2d 48 (1983)

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Patricia S. JOHNSON, William J. Johnson and Daniel H. Johnson, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 18617.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 24, 1983.

Martin W. Custen, Ogden, for defendants and appellants.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Ted Cannon, County Atty., Jerry J. Kaufman, Deputy County Atty., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

DURHAM, Justice:

The defendants, Patricia S., William J. and Daniel H. Johnson,[1] appeal from jury convictions of theft by deception in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-405. We reverse the convictions.

For…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. KerekesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CrevistonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. ForsythUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API