Commonwealth v. Widmeyer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
We are confronted here with a jumbled record as a result of the failure of the moving parties to this litigation to distinguish between the Act of April 13„ 1867, P. L. 78, as amended, 18 PS §1251, which enables wives and children of deserting husbands to secure support, and the Act of March 13, 1903, P. L. 26, §2, as amended and reenacted prior to 1939,18 PS §1257, making desertion by the husband a misdemeanor: Commonwealth v. Smith, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 318, 178 A. 335; Commonwealth v. Carson, 82 Pa. Superior Ct. 291.
The original record, all of which, for some…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Commonwealth v. TragleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Commonwealth v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. McClellandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Roviello v. RovielloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Commonwealth ex rel. O'Brien v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Farmers & Merchants Trust Co. v. MadeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.