Acker v. Charles R. Burklew Construction
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KAHN, Judge.
Appellant Howard Acker seeks review of a compensation order finding his neck injury to be noncompensable. On April 21, 1992, Mr. Acker, then employed by appellee Burklew as a carpenter at a home construction site, had an onset of neck pain, accompanied by restriction of neck motion and muscle spasm. The evidence in this case is that Acker had preexisting degenerative arthritis in his neck, which had not caused any symptoms or problems prior to April 21, 1992. Burklew took the position that Acker’s neck pain on the job was purely fortuitous and not causally related to his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dept.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. McCookSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- MARKET FOOD DISTRIB., INC v. LevensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Medeiros v. RESIDENTIAL COMMUN. OF AMERICADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Monette v. Manatee Memorial Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vigliotti v. K-Mart Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Bryant v. David Lawrence Mental Health CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Sentry Insurance Co. v. HamlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019