Legal Opinion

Butler v. Peluso

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1957No. Civ. 22349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

From a judgment of $40,000 for personal injuries suffered by respondent, appellant seeks a reduction of the amount or a reversal for a new trial on the amount. The sole question posed by the appeal is whether the amount of the judgment is excessive.. In February 1955 respondent, then a woman of 70 years, while lawfully walking on the sidewalk along Western Avenue at Third Street in Los Angeles was wrongfully struck by defendant McClelland’s automobile as a result of the negligent operation by appellant of his car at the intersection. She was struck by the vehicle as it hurtled onto the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Aldrich v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Gist v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Holder v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henninger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API