Butler v. Peluso
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From a judgment of $40,000 for personal injuries suffered by respondent, appellant seeks a reduction of the amount or a reversal for a new trial on the amount. The sole question posed by the appeal is whether the amount of the judgment is excessive.. In February 1955 respondent, then a woman of 70 years, while lawfully walking on the sidewalk along Western Avenue at Third Street in Los Angeles was wrongfully struck by defendant McClelland’s automobile as a result of the negligent operation by appellant of his car at the intersection. She was struck by the vehicle as it hurtled onto the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Aldrich v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gist v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Holder v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Henninger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009