Legal Opinion

Leahy v. Joint School District No. 12

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

If there was no prior binding contract between defendant school district and Miss Schultz, the former teacher, then the plaintiff is entitled to recover by reason of having had a formal written contract with the school board made September 11, 1924, for the school year in question.

The defendant asserts that the presence of all three members of the school board at the annual school district meeting July 7th; their apparent recommendation or report of the hiring of Miss Schultz; their acquiescence in the proceeding resulting in the action, represented by the entry in the official minutes that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Van Straten v. MilquetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. McNolty v. Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Schaut v. Joint School District No. 6 of Lena & Little RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Meader v. Inhabitants of West NewburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Waldeck v. GoedkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API