Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Campau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1874PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

When this case was in this court before, it was decided that the execution sale under which the plaintiff claims was ineffectual as against the defendants, for the reason that no notice of the leyy on the land in dispute had been filed, and consequently the title of Theodore J. Campau, though acquired after the levy, was affected by neither the levy nor the sale. On a second trial an attempt has been made to avoid the force of that decision by showing that ■Campau was orally notified of the levy before his title Accrued; and the rejection of evidence to establish that fact is the error now…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Frost v. BeekmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  3. Lessee of Heister v. FortnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1809
  4. Sawyer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1836
  5. Barrows v. BaughmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. GoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In Re Michigan Lithographing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Bailey v. GalpinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. People ex rel. Esper v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API