Legal Opinion
Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 2, 1978No. 76-1650Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
436 U.S. 447 (1978)
OHRALIK
v.
OHIO STATE BAR ASSN.
No. 76-1650.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Argued January 16, 1978.
Decided May 30, 1978.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Eugene Gressman argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.
John R. Welch argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Albert L. Bell, Edward N. Heiser, and Thomas E. Palmer.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · PowellJustice Powell
In Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U. S. 350 (1977), this Court held that truthful advertising of "routine" legal services is protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments against blanket prohibition by a State. The Court…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
3Cases cited45 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.