Legal Opinion

Staten v. Gonzalez-Falla

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 18, 2005No. 1D03-5185Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

VAN NORTWICK, J.

The appellee’s motion for clarification is granted, our opinion filed on March 17, 2005 is hereby withdrawn, and the following opinion substituted therefor:

Shedrick Staten, as the personal representative of the Estate of Robert Taylor, appeals the trial court’s award to Celso M. Gonzalez-Falla, as trustee for the Gilman Article III Trust, of a statutory way of necessity across the Taylor property. Because the trial court did not restrict this easement to the uses which are permitted in section 704.01(2), Florida Statutes (2001), we reverse and remand.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blanton v. City of Pinellas ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Guess v. AzarSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Hunt v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Deseret Ranches of Florida, Inc. v. BowmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  5. Stein v. DarbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API